Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's write-off of a debt due from his son constituted a deemed gift under section 4(1)(c) of the Gift-tax Act.
Analysis: The debt had become time-barred, but both the lender and the borrower had continued to reflect it in their wealth-tax returns for the later years, showing that it was treated as an existing liability until the relevant accounting year. The assessee gave plausible reasons for not pursuing recovery, including the close family relationship and the impracticability of enforcement proceedings. On the facts, the write-off was bona fide. Even if the act amounted to an abandonment of the debt, the circumstances did not show a taxable transfer by way of gift within section 4(1)(c).
Conclusion: The write-off did not amount to a deemed gift and the addition was not sustainable, in favour of the assessee.