Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a reference under section 66(7) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 read with the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, interest on refund is payable only for the accounting period actually covered by the reference or also for other accounting periods affected by the principle decided in the reference.
Analysis: The proviso to section 66(7) applies where the assessment that is the subject-matter of the reference is reduced and the overpaid amount on that assessment becomes refundable with interest. The language and scheme of the provision show that both the substantive part and the proviso are confined to the same assessment that was directly before the High Court. Although the Excess Profits Tax Act treats the overall chargeable period as a larger statutory frame, each accounting period remains a separate unit for assessment. Refunds arising in later or earlier periods because the legal principle settled in the reference is followed are not refunds that result directly from the reference itself. The reference cannot be extended to generate interest on refunds outside the accounting period actually comprised in it.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to interest only on the refund relating to the particular accounting period covered by the reference, not on refunds for other accounting periods.