Bona fide belief and voluntary filing defeated penalty for delayed return filing under income-tax law.

Penalty for delayed filing under section 271(1)(a) was found unwarranted where the assessee had filed the return voluntarily and the returned income was below the taxable minimum. The delay was explained as resulting from a bona fide belief that no return was required, based on the partners' lack of education and absence of deliberate default. As the facts showed a genuine misconception rather than contumacious conduct, the penalty was cancelled in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for delay in filing the return, and whether the delay was supported by a bona fide belief that no return was required because the income was below the taxable minimum.

Analysis: The assessee filed the return voluntarily and the returned income was below the taxable minimum. The explanation was that the partners, being not well educated, believed in good faith that no return was necessary and that there was no deliberate default. On the facts, the delay was treated as arising from a bona fide impression rather than contumacious conduct.

Conclusion: The levy of penalty was not justified and was cancelled in favour of the assessee.

---