1978 (8) TMI 115 - AT - Income Tax

Appellate Tribunal allows deduction of income tax liability as 'debt owed' under Wealth-tax Act

The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras allowed the deduction of income tax liability under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 as a 'debt owed,' clarifying that a ... - Issues:1. Deductibility of income tax liability under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 as 'debt owed.'Analysis:The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras involved a case where the assessee, an individual, filed a return of net wealth admitting a certain amount for the assessment year 1976-77. The assessee claimed a deduction for income tax liability under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. The Wealth-tax Officer disallowed the claim due to the declaration being filed after the relevant valuation date. Upon appeal, the AAC allowed the deduction, stating that the liability existed before the valuation date and should be considered akin to income tax payable under the IT Act. The department appealed this decision, arguing that the liability did not crystallize on the valuation date and could not be considered a 'debt owed.' The Tribunal considered various precedents, including a decision by the Madras High Court and the Kerala High Court, which interpreted the term 'debt owed' under the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal held that a liability to pay an ascertainable sum of money in the future qualifies as a debt owed, even if the amount is not determined or due at the valuation date. The Tribunal emphasized that what is payable in the future and ascertainable as payable constitutes a debt owed by the assessee on the valuation date. Relying on the interpretations of other High Courts and Supreme Court rulings, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's claim for deduction of income tax liability as a debt owed, directing that the liability should be deducted in computing the net wealth of the assessee. The appeal by the department was allowed in favor of the assessee.In conclusion, the judgment clarified the concept of 'debt owed' under the Wealth-tax Act, emphasizing that a liability to pay an ascertainable sum of money in the future qualifies as a debt owed, even if the amount is not determined or due at the valuation date. The Tribunal's decision aligned with interpretations by other High Courts and Supreme Court rulings, allowing the deduction of income tax liability as a debt owed in computing the net wealth of the assessee.