Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the valuation of the let-out portion of the building was to be determined by adopting the assessee's multiple of 12 times or the Revenue's higher multiple. (ii) Whether, in view of section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the value of the self-occupied property for the subsequent assessment years had to be taken at the same figure as adopted for assessment year 1971-72.
Issue (i): Whether the valuation of the let-out portion of the building was to be determined by adopting the assessee's multiple of 12 times or the Revenue's higher multiple.
Analysis: The let-out portion comprised shops and residential flats. The Revenue had relied on the valuation cell report and applied higher multiples, while the assessee had adopted 12 times. Reference was made to prior Tribunal decisions approving a 10-times multiple for similar years. On the facts, the assessee's adoption of 12 times was considered reasonable and acceptable.
Conclusion: The multiple of 12 times was accepted and the Wealth-tax Officer was directed to recompute the value accordingly, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether, in view of section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the value of the self-occupied property for the subsequent assessment years had to be taken at the same figure as adopted for assessment year 1971-72.
Analysis: The Tribunal had already taken the view in several cases that section 7(4) operated retrospectively. Applying that view, the value adopted for the self-occupied property in assessment year 1971-72 was held to govern the subsequent years as well.
Conclusion: The same value as adopted for assessment year 1971-72 was directed to be applied for the subsequent years, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The valuation adopted by the assessee was substantially accepted, and the assessments were directed to be recomputed accordingly, resulting in allowance of the appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Tribunal finds the assessee's valuation multiple reasonable on the facts, and section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 is treated as retrospective, the self-occupied property value adopted for one assessment year may be carried forward to subsequent years.