1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Upholds Decision Allowing TDS Credit to Assessee, Emphasizes Technical Error Over Fraudulent Behavior</h1> The Tribunal upheld the Dy. CIT(A)'s decision to allow the credit of TDS to the assessee. The appeal filed by the Department was dismissed, with the ... - Issues: Appeal against order of Dy. CIT(A) regarding credit of TDS to the assessee.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur involved a dispute regarding the credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) given to the assessee. The assessee, an employee of LIC, received a supplementary payment without TDS deduction due to an audit objection. Subsequently, TDS was deducted from the salary for November and December 1993 and deposited by LIC in the Government exchequer. The assessee requested credit for this TDS, which was initially denied by the Assessing Officer but allowed by the Dy. CIT(A) in the first appeal.Upon review, the Tribunal found that the mistake in not deducting TDS initially was due to an error by the employer, LIC, arising from an audit objection. The TDS was deducted and deposited after the objection was settled. It was noted that all assessments were completed by the time the TDS was deducted. The Tribunal observed that there was no malicious intent on the part of the assessee or the employer, especially considering LIC being a Government autonomous body. The error was attributed to internal processes within Government Departments related to audit objections and settlements. Importantly, it was highlighted that there was no loss to the Revenue, and the mistake was deemed technical rather than intentional.Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Dy. CIT(A) to allow the credit of TDS to the assessee. The appeal filed by the Department was dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the reasoning provided by the Dy. CIT(A) in support of the decision. The judgment emphasized the absence of any fraudulent behavior and the technical nature of the error, leading to the conclusion that the credit of TDS to the assessee was justifiable in the circumstances presented.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
