Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 80-I was to be computed at 20% of the profits and gains of the undertaking, or only on the residual income after allowing deduction under section 80-HH.
Analysis: The provisions of section 80HH(1) and section 80-I(1) emphasise deduction at 20% of the profits and gains of the undertaking and do not state that the deduction is to be calculated on income remaining after Chapter VI-A reliefs. Section 80HH(9) only ensures that, where multiple reliefs are available, the deduction under section 80-HH is allowed first. Section 80A(2) merely imposes an overall ceiling that the aggregate deduction under the Chapter cannot exceed the gross total income. The basis of computation therefore remains the profits of the undertaking, i.e. commercial profits, and not a reduced income figure after prior reliefs.
Conclusion: Deduction under section 80-I had to be allowed at 20% of the profits and gains of the undertaking, without reducing it by the deduction granted under section 80-HH; the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Chapter VI-A provisions prescribe deduction as a percentage of profits and gains of an undertaking, the deduction is to be computed on those profits themselves, subject only to the statutory ceiling on aggregate deductions, and not on income remaining after prior deductions under other sections.