Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum paid to the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner was an allowable deduction in the assessment year 1961-62, having regard to the stage at which the statutory liability to contribute under the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 became finally incurred.
Analysis: The liability to contribute under the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 arose only when the applicability of the Act to the assessee was conclusively determined. The Act applied only if the establishment was a factory in a scheduled industry and employed fifty or more persons. There was a bona fide dispute on the number of employees, and until that dispute was resolved by the competent authority, the assessee could not be said to have irrevocably incurred the liability. A mere later inspection report could not fix the accrual date retrospectively. Once the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner decided the matter and the assessee was required to make payment, the outgoing became an ascertained liability in the relevant accounting year.
Conclusion: The payment was deductible in the relevant assessment year and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.