Additional evidence in cash-credit disputes may be admitted when the assessee lacked a fair chance to rebut adverse material.

An assessee facing a cash-credit addition was denied an effective to rebut adverse material, including a statement recorded behind its back, and sought to file affidavits and a bank certificate as additional evidence. The appellate authority was required to consider whether sufficient cause prevented earlier production of that material and whether it was necessary for a fair decision. Where justice so requires, appellate powers are wide enough to admit such evidence. The additional evidence should have been admitted, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after giving both sides a proper hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was denied effective opportunity to meet the cash-credit addition and whether the additional evidence tendered before the appellate authority ought to have been admitted.

Analysis: The assessee was confronted with a statement recorded behind its back and was given only a short time to explain the credit. The depositor was stated to be hospitalised, and the assessee sought to produce affidavits and a bank certificate to support the genuineness of the cash credit. In these circumstances, the appellate authority was required to consider whether the assessee had been prevented by sufficient cause from producing the evidence earlier and whether the material was necessary for a satisfactory decision of the controversy. The appellate powers were wide enough to admit such evidence where justice so required.

Conclusion: The additional evidence ought to have been admitted, and the matter was correctly sent back for fresh consideration of the cash-credit addition after giving the parties a proper hearing.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee is not afforded an effective opportunity to rebut adverse material and is prevented by sufficient cause from producing relevant evidence, the appellate authority may and should admit additional evidence in the interest of justice and remit the matter for fresh decision.

---