Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal Partly Allowed: Clarifications on Retrenchment Compensation, Earned Leave, Staff Gratuity</h1> <h3>THE BEAWAR ELEC. SYPPLY CO. LTD. Versus THE INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> The appeal was partly allowed. The retrenchment compensation was not considered revenue expenditure, while earned leave wages were allowed. The staff ... - Issues Involved:1. Whether the appellant was conducting any business during the period under consideration.2. Whether the sum of Rs. 1,00,602 paid to the laborers as gratuity, leave salary, wages, compensation, etc., is revenue expenditure.3. The applicability of Section 41(2) regarding the computation of profit.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Whether the appellant was conducting any business during the period under consideration:The appellant company was generating and supplying electricity to Beawar under a state-issued license. The accounting year ended on 31st March 1963. The Rajasthan Government informed the company about the revocation of its license effective from 15th March 1964, leading to the company's decision to go into liquidation. Liquidators were appointed on 11th March 1964, but the Registrar did not accept the ordinary resolution for liquidation, requiring a special resolution passed on 29th September 1964. The State Government took over the company's electricity generation and supply on 15th March 1964. The company continued its business of electricity generation and distribution until 15th March 1964. The income and expenditure for the period from 11th March 1964 to 15th March 1964 were transferred to the accounts closing on 10th March 1964. The AAC noted that the company did not carry on the business of electricity generation and supply during the accounting period except for four days, and the profit and loss account submitted related to the period from 15th March 1964 onwards when no business was carried on.2. Whether the sum of Rs. 1,00,602 paid to the laborers as gratuity, leave salary, wages, compensation, etc., is revenue expenditure:The appellant claimed various payments to staff on retrenchment due to the business takeover by the Rajasthan Government. The ITO disallowed the claim, stating that the expenses were not incurred for earning the income credited in the profit and loss account. The AAC also rejected the claim, stating that the expenses were not for carrying on the business but after its closure. The AAC relied on the decision in CIT vs. Gemini Cashew Sales Corpn. 65 ITR 643, which held that liability for retrenchment compensation arises only after the closure of the business and not during its operation. The Tribunal agreed that the retrenchment compensation of Rs. 23,143 was not allowable as it arose after the business closure. However, the staff earned leave wages of Rs. 19,202 were considered allowable as they were due during employment. The staff gratuity payment of Rs. 50,927 required further examination to determine if it was related to carrying on the business or its closure. Other expenses like salary, postage, stationery, etc., were allowed as they were incidental to the business carried on for five days.3. The applicability of Section 41(2) regarding the computation of profit:The Tribunal examined whether any part of the sale proceeds of stores could be subjected to profit under Section 41(2). It concluded that items sold, which were in stock, could not be taxed under Section 41(2) unless depreciation was allowed on them. For items where depreciation was allowed and the written-down value was nil, the profit under Section 41(2) was justified. The contention that the sale was made by the liquidator and not the company was dismissed, as the liquidator represents the company, and the income from the company's assets is assessable in its hands.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed. The retrenchment compensation was not considered revenue expenditure, while earned leave wages were allowed. The staff gratuity payment required further examination. Other business-related expenses were allowed. The profit under Section 41(2) was justified for items with allowed depreciation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found