Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's earlier view, based on a decision dealing with tax collected under a provision of the 1922 Act, suffered from a mistake apparent from the record when applied to assessment years governed by the 1961 Act, for which the corresponding provisional-assessment provision had already ceased to operate.
Analysis: The ruling relied upon by the Tribunal concerned tax collected under section 23B of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The parallel provision under the Income-tax Act, 1961 was section 141, but that provision had been omitted with effect from 1971. For the assessment years in question, there was no operative provision authorising provisional assessment. In that legal setting, reliance on the Allahabad High Court decision was misplaced and the error was patent from the record.
Conclusion: The assessee's miscellaneous application succeeded, and the earlier order was treated as containing a mistake apparent from the record.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal corrected its earlier disposal and directed that the connected appeals be re-fixed for hearing, thereby granting relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A precedent based on a repealed or inapplicable statutory provision cannot validly support an order for assessment years governed by a different statutory regime, and reliance on such a precedent may constitute a mistake apparent from the record.