TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Family assets deemed individual ownership subject to wealth-tax; court rules in favor of assessee.</h1> <h3>Gajanand Sutwala Versus Commissioner of Wealth-Tax, UP</h3> The High Court of Allahabad held that assets assessed in Gajanand's name belonged to the Hindu undivided family he was part of. The property left by ... Where there only existed a coparcener and his wife and it was held that they constituted a HUF and the assessment was required to be made in that status The High Court of Allahabad ruled that the assets assessed in the hands of Gajanand belonged to the Hindu undivided family constituted by Gajanand, his mother, and his wife. The court held that the property left by Rameshwar Das was owned by Gajanand as an individual and was subject to wealth-tax. The court referred to a similar case under the Income-tax Act and decided in favor of the assessee. The department was ordered to pay the costs of the assessee. Appeal dismissed. (Case citation: 1965 (11) TMI 10 - ALLAHABAD High Court)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
