1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal overturns interest levy under ITA 1961, rectifies mistake.</h1> The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the interest levied under section 217 by the Income Tax Officer while ... - Issues:- Appeal against rejection of application under s. 154 of the IT Act for levying interest under s. 217.- Interpretation of regular assessment under s. 2(40) of the Act.- Mistake apparent from the record for rectification under s. 154.Analysis:The case involved an appeal by the assessee against the rejection of their application under section 154 of the Income Tax Act for the levy of interest under section 217. The original assessment for the assessment year 1979-80 was completed by clubbing income for two periods due to a change in the firm's constitution. The AAC directed two separate assessments based on a High Court decision. The issue arose when interest under section 217 was levied by the ITO while giving effect to the AAC's order, which the assessee contended was not valid as it was not part of a regular assessment under sections 143(3) or 144 of the Act.The assessee argued that interest under section 217 could only be levied during a regular assessment as defined in section 2(40) of the Act. The ITO's action of levying interest while implementing the AAC's order was deemed a mistake apparent from the record, warranting rectification under section 154. The AAC and ITO rejected the application, citing ambiguity in the law's interpretation regarding the levy of interest under section 217. However, the tribunal disagreed, emphasizing that interest under section 217 should only be charged during a regular assessment, not during other proceedings like giving effect to an order.The tribunal held that the ITO's levy of interest under section 217 while implementing the AAC's order was incorrect and constituted a clear mistake apparent from the records. The tribunal concluded that the assessee's case fell within the scope of section 154 of the Act, and the authorities were unjustified in rejecting the application. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the appeal, reversed the AAC's order, and directed the ITO to cancel the interest levied under section 217 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.