Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the multiple of 16.178 adopted for capitalisation in valuing the assessee's property for wealth-tax purposes was excessive and required reduction.
Issue (i): Whether the multiple of 16.178 adopted for capitalisation in valuing the assessee's property for wealth-tax purposes was excessive and required reduction.
Analysis: The grounds not pressed were not examined. On the valuation issue, the property was still under construction during the relevant year and the completed portion had been let out. Having regard to the facts and the material on record, the capitalisation multiple adopted by the lower authority was found to be on the higher side and a lower multiple was considered reasonable.
Conclusion: The multiple was reduced to 12 1/2 times and the relief was to be worked out accordingly, in favour of the assessee.