Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the machineries used in the manufacture of beer came into contact with corrosive chemicals so as to qualify for a higher rate of depreciation, and whether the assessee was entitled to such benefit in respect of all the machineries except those specifically excluded.
Analysis: The machinery was inspected on the spot and evidence was recorded regarding the stages of beer manufacture, the nature of the raw material, the chemicals added during processing, the acidity of the liquid at different stages, and the corrosive effect of brine, carbon dioxide and other substances on the plant and machinery. On that basis, it was found that the raw material underwent chemical changes and that corrosive chemicals came into contact with most of the machinery during manufacture. The Tribunal distinguished the Punjab and Haryana High Court decision relied on by the Revenue on the ground that the facts were materially different.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to higher depreciation at 15% on all machineries except the specified items which did not come into contact with corrosive chemicals.