Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 140A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was exigible where the assessee did not pay the full self-assessment tax on the footing that refund was due to a partnership firm in which he held a share.
Analysis: The unpaid amount was linked to a refund due from the revenue to the firm, and the assessee's share of that refund substantially covered the tax payable. The default in not separately remitting the self-assessment tax was treated as technical, with no attempt to deprive the revenue of its lawful dues and no loss of interest. Applying the principle that penalty should not be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so, the conduct was held to fall within the category of a venial breach.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 140A(3) was not justified and was cancelled in favour of the assessee.