Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal success: Certain expenses allowed as business expenses, while others disallowed. Membership fee deemed legitimate.</h1> <h3>ANARKALI CHIT FUND PVT. LTD. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> ANARKALI CHIT FUND PVT. LTD. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER. - TTJ 032, 134, Issues Involved:1. Classification of expenses as entertainment expenditure.2. Disallowance of expenses incurred for the 11th Anniversary Celebrations.3. Disallowance of expenses related to incentives for additional subscribers.4. Disallowance of tea and coffee expenses.5. Disallowance of club membership fee for the Managing Director.6. Disallowance of donations.7. Additional ground regarding disallowance under Rule 6B of the IT Rules.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Expenses as Entertainment Expenditure:The primary issue revolves around whether various expenses incurred by the assessee, a Private Limited Company running Chit Funds, qualify as entertainment expenditure under Section 37(2A) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that these expenses were business expenditures allowable under Section 37(1), while the Income Tax Officer (ITO) treated them as entertainment expenditure.2. Disallowance of Expenses Incurred for the 11th Anniversary Celebrations:The assessee incurred expenses totaling Rs. 35,843 for the 11th Anniversary Celebrations, including payments to Sargam Orchestra and other incidental expenses. The ITO disallowed these expenses as entertainment expenditure. The Tribunal noted that the Bombay High Court in CIT vs. Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. (1978) 111 ITR 290 (Bom) recognized such expenses as business expenses. The Tribunal concluded that the provision of music and related expenses did not fall within the definition of entertainment expenditure and should be considered as sales promotion expenses.3. Disallowance of Expenses Related to Incentives for Additional Subscribers:The assessee offered incentives, including a free trip to Kathmandu or a cash alternative, to members who brought in additional subscribers. The ITO disallowed these expenses, amounting to Rs. 1,54,254 for the trips and Rs. 72,546 for the cash alternatives, as entertainment expenditure. The Tribunal held that these expenses were not entertainment expenditure but were part of a contractual obligation, similar to commission paid to agents. Thus, they were allowable business expenses.4. Disallowance of Tea and Coffee Expenses:The assessee incurred Rs. 13,451 on tea and coffee expenses, which the ITO disallowed as entertainment expenditure. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance, agreeing with the Commissioner(A) that these expenses were in the nature of entertainment expenditure.5. Disallowance of Club Membership Fee for the Managing Director:The assessee paid Rs. 5,000 for the life membership of the Managing Director at the Nizam Club, arguing it was necessary for business purposes. The ITO and Commissioner(A) disallowed this expense as personal expenditure. The Tribunal, however, accepted the assessee's submission, recognizing it as business expenditure necessary for maintaining business contacts.6. Disallowance of Donations:The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 2,931, which were treated as donations and not business expenditure.7. Additional Ground Regarding Disallowance under Rule 6B of the IT Rules:The assessee sought to raise an additional ground regarding the disallowance of Rs. 8,883 incurred in connection with the 11th Anniversary Celebrations, invoking Rule 6B of the IT Rules. The Tribunal declined to entertain this additional ground, noting that it was not raised before the Commissioner(A).Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal ruled that expenses related to the 11th Anniversary Celebrations and incentives for additional subscribers were not entertainment expenditure and should be allowed as business expenses. However, it upheld the disallowance of tea and coffee expenses and donations. The club membership fee for the Managing Director was allowed as business expenditure. The additional ground regarding Rule 6B was not entertained.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found