1986 (3) TMI 134 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal rules on carry forward of losses for multiple assessment years

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the decision not to carry forward losses for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77 but confirming ... Return Of Income, Loss Issues Involved:1. Carry forward of losses from earlier years.2. Validity and timing of returns filed under sections 139(4) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. Interpretation of section 80 in conjunction with section 139(3) and 139(4).4. Applicability of legal precedents and tribunal decisions.Detailed Analysis:1. Carry Forward of Losses from Earlier Years:The primary issue revolves around whether the assessee can carry forward losses from previous years (1975-76 to 1980-81) to the assessment year 1981-82. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed the Income Tax Officer (ITO) to carry forward the losses for these years, but the department contested this decision.2. Validity and Timing of Returns Filed under Sections 139(4) and 148:The ITO initially allowed the carry forward of losses for the years 1975-76 to 1980-81 but later rejected this during the assessment for 1981-82, arguing that the returns were not filed within the allowable time under section 139(3). The assessee contended that returns filed under section 139(4) before the last day for completion of assessment are valid and should allow the carry forward of losses. The ITO argued that section 139(3) is restrictive and requires filing within the time allowed under section 139(1) for the benefit of carry forward of losses.3. Interpretation of Section 80 in Conjunction with Section 139(3) and 139(4):The ITO interpreted section 80 to mean that the return must be filed as per section 139(3) to benefit from the carry forward of losses. The assessee relied on the decision in C.P. Sarathy Mudaliar v. CIT, arguing that section 80 allows for returns filed under any subsection of section 139, thus supporting the carry forward of losses even if filed under section 139(4).4. Applicability of Legal Precedents and Tribunal Decisions:The Commissioner (Appeals) relied on several judicial precedents, including Presidency Medical Centre (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, Telster Advertising (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, and CIT v. Pratapgarh Cold Storage & Ice Factory, to support the assessee's case. The ITO, however, cited the Calcutta High Court decision in Sun Engg. Works. (P.) Ltd. v. CIT to argue against the carry forward of losses.Tribunal's Decision:Assessment Years 1975-76 and 1976-77:The Tribunal held that the returns for these years were filed beyond the two-year limit from the end of the assessment year and also beyond the time prescribed under section 148 notices. Therefore, these returns cannot be considered valid under section 139(4), and the losses determined in these assessments cannot be carried forward or set off. The Tribunal cited various legal authorities and previous decisions to support this conclusion, including the Calcutta High Court decisions and the Tribunal's own decision in X v. ITO.Assessment Years 1977-78 to 1980-81:The Tribunal found that the returns for these years were filed within two years from the end of the respective assessment years, making them valid under section 139(4). The Tribunal also noted that no section 148 notices were issued for the years 1979-80 and 1980-81, and the returns were filed voluntarily within the allowable time. Therefore, the losses for these years should be computed, carried forward, and set off against the income of subsequent years. The Tribunal cited the Madhya Pradesh High Court decision in Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. v. CIT to support this view.Conclusion:The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal. It upheld the ITO's decision not to carry forward the losses for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77, deeming those assessments non est in law. However, it confirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to carry forward and set off the losses for the assessment years 1977-78 to 1980-81. The appeal was thus partly allowed, reflecting a nuanced interpretation of the relevant sections of the Income-tax Act and the applicable judicial precedents.