TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Lease transactions reclassified as finance deals subject to interest-tax</h1> <h3>Maruti Countrywide Auto Financial Services (P.) Limited. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> Maruti Countrywide Auto Financial Services (P.) Limited. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER. - TTJ 120, 760, [2009] 29 SOT 151 (DELHI) (SB) Issues Involved:1. Whether the interest element on income from lease transactions, deemed as finance/loan transactions, is chargeable to interest-tax under the Interest-tax Act, 1974.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Nature of Lease Transactions:The primary issue was whether the lease transactions, already held to be in the nature of finance/loan transactions, could be charged to interest-tax. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated lease rentals as finance charges and charged interest-tax on the interest component. The CIT(A) upheld this view, considering the transactions as purely financing arrangements with an interest component chargeable under the Interest-tax Act.2. Legal Precedents and Tribunal Decisions:The assessee relied on the Mumbai Tribunal's decision in Union Bank of India vs. Addl. CIT, arguing that finance leasing, although a mode of financial accommodation, is not a direct monetary transaction like a loan or advance and, therefore, should not be taxable under the Interest-tax Act. However, the Delhi Bench in Jindal Lease Finance Ltd. vs. Asstt. CIT, supported by the Supreme Court's principles in Sundaram Finance Ltd., held that such transactions are loans, making the interest component taxable.3. Special Bench Decision in Gujarat Gas Financial Services Ltd.:The Special Bench in Gujarat Gas Financial Services Ltd. vs. Asstt. CIT held that if a lease transaction is substantively a loan or finance transaction, the interest component is taxable under the Interest-tax Act. The definition of 'interest' in Section 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act was interpreted as exhaustive, meaning it covers interest on loans and advances, regardless of the form or name given to the transaction.4. Arguments by the Assessee:The assessee argued that the definition of 'interest' under the Interest-tax Act is restrictive compared to the Income-tax Act, and only interest on direct loans or advances should be taxable. They cited various judicial decisions to support the distinction between loans and debts, emphasizing that not all debts arise from loans.5. Department's Stand:The Department contended that the interest component in lease rentals should be taxable under the Interest-tax Act, as the substance of the transaction is financial accommodation, creating a debtor-creditor relationship.6. Tribunal's Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the financial lease transactions of the assessee, being in the nature of loans, are chargeable to interest-tax under Section 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act. The Tribunal followed the Special Bench decision in Gujarat Gas Financial Services Ltd., emphasizing the substance over the form of transactions. The matter was remanded to the AO for quantification of the interest component in lease rentals for accurate tax computation.7. Quantification of Interest:The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for determining the exact quantum of interest chargeable to interest-tax, considering the dispute over the amounts assessed by the AO and CIT(A).Final Decision:The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, affirming that the interest component in lease rentals is chargeable to interest-tax, with the matter remanded to the AO for precise quantification.
TaxTMI 