Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could be treated as an assessee in default under section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of expatriate remuneration claimed to be exempt under article 14(2) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with France.
Analysis: The expatriate employees were present in India for less than 183 days and their remuneration was paid by a non-resident employer. The remaining condition under article 14(2)(c) was whether the remuneration was deducted in computing the profits of a permanent establishment chargeable to tax in India. The accounts and return did not show any actual claim or deduction of such expatriate salary while computing the Indian taxable profits. The deemed profit computation under section 44BB could not be used to import a further fiction that the salary had been deducted, because a legal fiction is confined to the purpose for which it is created and cannot be extended by another fiction. The treaty language required actual deduction, not deemed deduction, and the treaty governed over the domestic provision.
Conclusion: The assessee was not an assessee in default under section 201 for the expatriate remuneration covered by article 14(2) of the treaty; the exemption applied in the assessee's favour.
Ratio Decidendi: A deeming provision for presumptive business income cannot be extended to treat salary as deducted for the separate purpose of treaty exemption where the treaty requires actual deduction in computing permanent establishment profits.