Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Invalid assessment under Section 147(a) canceled by Tribunal due to lack of rational connection.</h1> The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147(a) was invalid and illegal as there was no rational connection between the ... - Issues Involved:1. Justification of the CIT (Appeals) in confirming the reopening of assessment under Section 147(a) of the IT Act, 1961.2. Assessment of income from undisclosed sources amounting to Rs. 75,000.3. Disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 2,026.Detailed Analysis:1. Justification of the CIT (Appeals) in confirming the reopening of assessment under Section 147(a) of the IT Act, 1961:The original assessment was completed on 25th February 1965, with the total income determined at Rs. 63,207. The assessee had provided the ITO with copies of its profit & loss account and balance sheet as of 31st March 1964, which included interest claims and balances due to various parties. Despite this, the ITO did not question the genuineness of the loans at that time.However, based on a subsequent examination of Manohar Lal Gopal Dass, the ITO concluded that the loan appearing in his name was not genuine. The ITO initiated proceedings under Section 147(a), citing the failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. The CIT (Appeals) agreed with the ITO's decision to reopen the assessment, relying heavily on the statement of Manohar Lal Gopal Dass.The Tribunal found that the ITO had no new material evidence to justify the change of opinion regarding the other three parties (Afghan Fruit Co., Kanhya Lal Moti Ram, and Fateh Chand Manohar Lal). The Tribunal emphasized that the reasons for the formation of belief under Section 147(a) must have a rational connection with the material coming to the ITO's notice. The Tribunal held that there was no direct nexus between the statement of Manohar Lal Gopal Dass and the formation of the belief that there had been an escapement of income due to the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts.2. Assessment of income from undisclosed sources amounting to Rs. 75,000:The ITO's conclusion that the credits in the names of the four parties were not genuine loans and represented the assessee's income from undisclosed sources was based on the confessional statement of Manohar Lal Gopal Dass. The ITO found that the receipts and payments to these parties were often made by cheques, with deposits and withdrawals occurring immediately before and after the transactions.The Tribunal noted that Manohar Lal Gopal Dass admitted to earning brokerage by arranging finances for different parties and did not advance his own money. However, there was no indication that the transactions with the assessee were bogus or havala entries. The Tribunal found that the ITO's inference that the credits represented the assessee's income was unsupported by evidence.3. Disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 2,026:The ITO disallowed the interest claimed to have been paid to M/s. Gopal Dass Udhay Das, based on the conclusion that the credits were not genuine loans. The CIT (Appeals) upheld this disallowance, agreeing with the ITO's assessment that the loans were not genuine borrowings.The Tribunal, however, found that the ITO's and CIT (Appeals)' conclusions were based on insufficient evidence. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had provided all necessary documents and confirmations during the original assessment, and the ITO had accepted these as full and true disclosures without doubting their genuineness.Conclusion:The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147(a) was invalid and illegal, as the ITO could not have a reason to believe that the income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment due to the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Consequently, the reassessment was canceled, and the appeal was allowed. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to address the merits of the case regarding the genuineness of the credits and the disallowance of interest.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found