Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants relief to assessee on various grounds under Section 35B of IT Act</h1> <h3>BANSAL EXPORTS (P) LTD. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, granting relief to the assessee on various grounds related to Section 35B of the IT Act. The Tribunal upheld the ... - Issues Involved:1. Allowance under Section 35B of the IT Act.2. Determination of the assessee as a small scale industrial undertaking.3. Specific claims under Section 35B for various expenses.4. Disallowance of loss of money.5. Disallowance of travelling expenses.6. Disallowance of staff welfare expenses.7. Investment allowance claim.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Allowance under Section 35B of the IT Act:The main ground of the appeal concerns the allowance of the claim made under Section 35B of the IT Act. The assessee questioned the decision of the ITO, which was not addressed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the objection raised by the Department was not wholly sustainable, as the issue was taken up by the assessee before both the ITO and the IAC. The Tribunal permitted the assessee to raise this question, noting that all necessary materials were furnished before the ITO.2. Determination of the Assessee as a Small Scale Industrial Undertaking:The Tribunal needed to determine whether the assessee was a small scale industrial undertaking to avail the benefits of Section 35B. According to the Finance Act, 1978, and the relevant provisions under Section 32A, the aggregate value of the machinery and plant should not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs. The balance sheet showed the value of total assets at Rs. 8,02,639, satisfying the condition. Thus, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee was indeed a small scale industrial undertaking and entitled to the benefits even after 1st April 1978.3. Specific Claims under Section 35B for Various Expenses:- Melting Weight Loss and Refining and Melting Charges: The Tribunal allowed the claims, referencing a prior decision by the Delhi Bench 'E' of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 1977-78.- Establishment Expenses: The Tribunal allowed the claim for the period from 1st April 1978 to 30th June 1978, as the assessee was deemed a small scale industrial undertaking.- Staff Welfare and Staff Expenses: The Tribunal directed the allowance of weighted deduction for the entire period, treating it similarly to establishment expenses.- Administrative, General, and Selling and Distribution Expenses: The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow weighted deduction for expenses incurred from 1st April 1978 to 30th June 1978, as the assessee was a small scale industrial undertaking.- Financial Expenses (Interest on Pre-shipment and Post-shipment Advances): The Tribunal allowed the claim, following the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT vs. Vippy Solvex Product P. Ltd., which held that such interest was eligible for weighted deduction under Section 35B(1)(b)(viii).4. Disallowance of Loss of Money:The Tribunal allowed the claim for the loss of Rs. 3,700, finding the assessee's version of the loss credible despite the absence of an FIR. The Tribunal believed the loss was genuine and allowable.5. Disallowance of Travelling Expenses:The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs. 7,920 incurred by Shri Puran Mal, noting that he was the father of one of the directors and could assist in the business. The Tribunal found no justification for disallowing the expenses as unrelated to the business.6. Disallowance of Staff Welfare Expenses:The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs. 16,187, rejecting the Department's view that it was entertainment expenditure. The details provided showed the expenses were genuinely for staff welfare, with only a minor portion being for entertainment.7. Investment Allowance Claim:The claim for investment allowance of Rs. 13,353 was not pressed by the assessee, and thus, no further discussion was required.Conclusion:The appeal was allowed in part, with the Tribunal granting relief on several grounds while upholding the disallowance of the investment allowance.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found