Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Interest Income Additions Deleted; ITAT Emphasizes Mutuality Principle and Proper Objection Handling in Assessments.</h1> The appeals were partly allowed, with the ITAT directing the deletion of additions made in the assessment orders for the years 1997-98 and 1998-99. The ... Income Escaping Assessment - initiation of assessment proceedings u/s 147 - notice issued u/s 148 - HELD THAT- In the instant case on the reasons recorded it is apparent that the learned Assessing Officer entertained an honest belief that assessee's income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. The belief was based on application of mind on relevant facts. I, therefore, see no merit in grounds of appeal Nos. 1 and 2 taken by the assessee. The same are rejected. In the appeals before me the dispute relates to the assessment of a sum for assessment year 1997-98 and assessment year 1998-99 assessed by the Assessing Officer on account of interest income of the assessee on fixed deposits with the bank. It is seen that interest income earned by an assessee on surplus funds of a mutual society deposited with a banking institution are covered by the principle of mutuality, as held by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in their judgment in the case of DIT v. All India Oriental Bank of Commerce Welfare Society [2003 (1) TMI 704 - DELHI HIGH COURT]. In my opinion the authorities below have erred in distinguishing the E aforesaid judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court on the ground that the assessee is a co-operative housing society whose income was not exempt u/s 11. Hence, respectfully following the judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court above mentioned, I direct deletion of the additions made in orders u/s 147 read with section 143(3) for both assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99. In the result, these two appeals are partly allowed. Issues:Initiation of proceedings under section 147 based on interest income on bank deposits. Completion of assessment under section 147 without disposing of preliminary objections.Analysis:Issue 1: Initiation of proceedings under section 147- The appeals were filed against the order of the CIT(Appeals) for assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99.- The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 147 based on interest income on bank deposits that had escaped assessment.- The reasons to believe were recorded by the Assessing Officer, indicating the income earned by the assessee from bank deposits.- The appellant argued that the interest income fell within the principle of mutuality, citing Tribunal orders and court pronouncements.- The Accountant Member held that the Assessing Officer had bona fide reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment based on relevant material.- The correctness of the reasons could be examined in appellate proceedings, but the sufficiency of reasons could not be questioned.- The initiation of proceedings under section 147 was deemed valid as the Assessing Officer had an honest belief supported by relevant facts.Issue 2: Completion of assessment without disposing of preliminary objections- The appellant contended that the assessment order under section 147 was invalid as the preliminary objections were not disposed of by the Assessing Officer.- Citing the judgments in the cases of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. and Arvind Mills Ltd., the appellant argued that a speaking order on objections was necessary before completing the assessment.- The Accountant Member acknowledged the requirement for the Assessing Officer to dispose of objections by passing a speaking order.- However, there was no express provision for an interim order on objections under the Income-tax Act.- The Accountant Member held that the infirmity in this case was an irregular exercise of jurisdiction, not a lack of inherent jurisdiction.- The Accountant Member directed the deletion of additions made in the assessment orders for both years based on interest income, following the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court.Conclusion:- The appeals were partly allowed, with the additions made in the assessment orders for both years being deleted based on the principle of mutuality regarding interest income on bank deposits by the mutual society.This analysis provides a detailed overview of the issues involved in the legal judgment, including the reasons for initiation of proceedings under section 147 and the completion of assessment without addressing preliminary objections. The Accountant Member's decision and reasoning are outlined for each issue, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the judgment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found