1995 (3) TMI 149 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal rules in favor of assessee in gift-tax assessment, emphasizing valid consideration & necessity in transaction.

The Tribunal overturned the gift-tax assessment for the assessment year 1980-81, ruling in favor of the assessee. It emphasized the presence of valid ... - Issues: Gift-tax assessment for the assessment year 1980-81Analysis:The appeal pertains to a gift-tax assessment for the assessment year 1980-81. The case involves the purchase of land and building by the assessee and her husband, where the value declared in the deed was contested during proceedings under section 269C. The actual payment made during a search under section 132 was found to be higher than the declared value. The Gift Tax Officer (GTO) contended that the excess payment constituted a gift, despite the assessee's argument that the transaction was for consideration and not a gift. The GTO completed the gift-tax assessment, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. The assessee challenged this assessment, leading to the present appeal.The Tribunal examined the submissions and records, noting discrepancies in the valuation of the property. The market value was initially assessed at Rs. 3,14,600 but was later revised to Rs. 3,84,844 by the Superintending Engineer of the valuation cell. The Tribunal emphasized that even if the original market value was considered low, the payment was necessitated by the circumstances, as the assessee required a residential house near a hospital upon returning from abroad. The Tribunal distinguished between a voluntary gift and a transaction made out of necessity, asserting that the latter does not constitute a gift. Furthermore, it clarified that the assessee, as the purchaser, had paid a sum of Rs. 3,88,000 for the property, indicating a transaction with consideration. The Tribunal highlighted that there was no inadequacy of consideration, and the transaction did not fall under the purview of the Gift Tax Act. It emphasized that the higher price paid by the purchaser did not automatically classify the transaction as a gift, especially when there was no evidence of obtaining the property at a lower cost elsewhere. Additionally, the absence of a close relationship between the seller and the assessee further supported the conclusion that the transaction was not a gift. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the gift-tax assessment.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the gift-tax assessment for the assessment year 1980-81. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances of a transaction, the presence of valid consideration, and the absence of elements that would classify the transaction as a gift under the Gift Tax Act.