Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of individual notice under section 19(2) of the Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1939, assessment could validly be completed under section 20(4) without resort to proceedings under section 30, and whether such assessments were barred by limitation.
Analysis: The statutory scheme distinguished between a general notice under section 19(1), an individual notice under section 19(2), and reassessment in cases of escaped income under section 30. A best judgment assessment under section 20(4) could not be invoked as a substitute for the mandatory procedural steps where no return had been filed pursuant to the general notice. The scheme of the Act, including the assessee's statutory right under section 43(2)(a), showed that assessment proceedings were initiated only by service of notice under section 19(2) or by proceedings under section 30 within the prescribed period. The corresponding provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and the principles governing escaped assessment supported this view.
Conclusion: The assessments made without compliance with section 19(2) or valid recourse to section 30 were unsustainable, and the challenge by the assessees succeeded.