Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while valuing the remaindermen's interest in trust property for wealth-tax purposes, the probable estate duty payable on the deemed death of the life tenant had to be taken into account and treated as a relevant deduction or diminishing factor.
Analysis: Wealth-tax is charged on net wealth as on the relevant valuation date, and the valuation of jewellery and similar assets has to be made on the basis of the price it would fetch in the open market. The interest of the remainderman was not an outright possessory interest; it was the right to receive the property on termination of the life interest. Since any estate duty payable on the death of the life tenant would operate as a charge on the property, it constituted an encumbrance and therefore affected the price a willing and informed buyer would offer. The legal fiction under the wealth-tax scheme had to be carried to its logical conclusion, and the valuation had to reflect the burden that would diminish the ultimate value of the remainder interest.
Conclusion: The estate duty liability was a relevant factor in valuing the remainder interest, and its deduction from the market value was upheld, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In valuing a remainder interest for wealth-tax, any legally operative charge on the property that would reduce the price a willing buyer would pay on the relevant valuation date must be taken into account as part of the market-value estimation.