Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Phrase 'order passed by the Income-tax Officer' in s.263 includes ITO orders made under directions per s.144A/144B</h1> <h3>TN Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax</h3> SC held that the Tribunal was incorrect: the phrase 'order passed by the Income-tax Officer' in s.263 includes orders passed by the ITO on directions of a ... Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the CIT had no jurisdiction u/s 263 to revise an order passed by the Income-tax Officer with the approval of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner u/s 144B - having regard to the subsequent amendments to the Act issued from time to time there was no scope for limiting the phrase 'order passed by the Income-tax Officer' in s. 263 to exclude orders passed by the Income-tax Officer on the directions of a superior authority either u/s 144A/144B. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax to revise orders passed by the Income-tax Officer with the approval of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner under section 144B. The court upheld the High Court's decision, stating that the phrase 'order passed by the Income-tax Officer' in section 263 includes orders passed under the directions of a superior authority under sections 144A or 144B. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.