Engineering firm includes companies for engineering consultancy, ensuring such services fall within service tax liability.

The text clarifies that the term "engineering firm" in the Finance Act, 1994 must be read in its ordinary, popular sense within the statute's scheme and charging and liability provisions, and therefore encompasses companies providing engineering consultancy; excluding companies would create an irrational differentia and an absurd tax exemption. The clarification also upholds related administrative circulars as within delegated legislative parameters and valid, ensuring identical engineering consultancy services are taxable regardless of provider form.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the expression "engineering firm" used in the definition of "consulting engineer" in Section 65(13) of the Finance Act, 1994 includes a company.

Analysis: Section 65(13) defines "consulting engineer" by reference to a qualified individual and an "engineering firm"; other definitions in Section 65 use expressions such as "person", "concern" or "commercial concern". The definition must be construed by ordinary grammatical meaning in the context and scheme of the Act, read with Sections 66 and 68 (the charging and liability provisions) and Rule 6(1) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Absent an express legislative exclusion, treating "firm" in a narrow technical sense to exclude companies would create an intelligible differentia without rationale and lead to an absurdity whereby identical taxable services provided by a company would escape the tax while identical services provided by individuals, proprietorships or partnerships would be taxable. The word "firm" in Section 65(13) is qualified by "engineering" and is used to identify the class of providers of engineering consultancy services; the statutory use of "firm" elsewhere (including Section 81) and the charging and liability provisions support reading "engineering firm" in its ordinary, popular sense as encompassing business establishments providing engineering consultancy, including companies.

Conclusion: The expression "engineering firm" in Section 65(13) of the Finance Act, 1994 includes a company; the circulars (Circular No. 43/5/97-TRU dated July 2, 1997 and the Trade Circular dated July 3, 1997) are within the parameters of delegated legislation and valid.

Ratio Decidendi: When a definition in a fiscal statute is read in context with charging and liability provisions, and no intelligible differentia or rationale exists to exclude a class, terms used in their ordinary, popular sense may be read to include companies so as to avoid an absurd exemption from tax and to give effect to the object of the enactment.

---