Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled, for income-tax purposes, to value closing stock of shares and securities at cost or market value whichever is lower, even though its statutory accounts reflected valuation at cost under the Companies Act, and whether section 145 permitted rejection of that method.
Analysis: The method of valuing closing stock at cost or market value whichever is lower is a well-recognised rule of commercial accounting and reflects prudent recognition of anticipated loss. Section 145 requires computation of business income in accordance with the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee, unless the Assessing Officer forms the opinion that income cannot properly be deduced therefrom. The fact that the statutory balance sheet adopted cost valuation did not, by itself, displace the consistently followed tax computation method. The principle that accounting practice cannot override the taxing statute was distinguished from the position where the statute itself recognises the accounting method for tax computation.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to compute income on the basis of closing stock valued at cost or market value whichever is lower, and the Revenue's objection under section 145 was rejected.