Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2003 (11) TMI 289 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee, Rejects Interest Levy & Expense Disallowance The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was not justified. They also deleted the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tax Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee, Rejects Interest Levy & Expense Disallowance

                            The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was not justified. They also deleted the disallowance of UK lb 430 as expenses incurred in connection with the sale of shares and debentures.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Disallowance of UK lb 430 as expenses incurred in connection with the sale of shares and debentures.

                            Issue 1: Levy of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C

                            The main controversy requiring adjudication was whether the CIT(A) was justified in confirming the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 1,24,638 and Rs. 2,52,499 respectively. The assessee, a non-resident company, had returned income under the head capital gains and other sources, aggregating to Rs. 1,69,62,578. The controversy arose when the assessee's cheque for advance tax dated 10th March, 1994, was cleared only on 16th April, 1994. The assessee contended that since the cheque was deposited on 15th March, 1994, they were not liable to pay interest under sections 234B and 234C.

                            The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that the payment of Rs. 83,25,820 could be considered made only on 15th April, 1994, thus making the assessee liable for interest under sections 234B and 234C. The Assessing Officer, relying on this ruling, levied the interest, which was upheld by the CIT(A).

                            However, the Tribunal noted that under section 245S of the Act, the advance ruling is binding but only on the specific question posed. The question was whether the amount paid by cheque dated 10th March, 1994, should be considered for computing interest on delay and deferment of advance tax payments. The Tribunal held that the ruling implied the payment was made on 15th April, 1994, and thus, should be ignored for computing interest under sections 234B and 234C.

                            The Tribunal further examined the provisions of section 209(1)(d), which mandates reducing the amount of tax deductible at source from the estimated tax liability for computing advance tax payable. Since the entire tax liability of the non-resident assessee should have been deducted at source under section 195, there was no advance tax liability, and hence, no interest under sections 234B and 234C was applicable.

                            The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the advance tax payable by the assessee as per the scheme of section 209, reducing the tax deductible at source from the estimated tax liability. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C, and allowed this ground of appeal.

                            Issue 2: Disallowance of UK lb 430 as Expenses

                            The second grievance was regarding the disallowance of UK lb 430, being expenses incurred in connection with the sale of shares and debentures of Rallis. The expenses were payments to ANZ International Merchant Banking for traveling expenses and allowances. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenditure due to lack of evidence, and the CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.

                            The Tribunal, after hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material, found that adequate material had been furnished by the assessee, including copies of relevant invoices and the agreement under which payments were made. The Tribunal noted that the authorities below were unsatisfied because vouchers supporting the expenses incurred by ANZ International Merchant Banking were not furnished. However, the Tribunal held that the factum of expenditure, genuineness, and purpose of the expense were clearly established by the assessee.

                            Thus, the Tribunal deemed it fit to delete the disallowance of UK lb 430 and allowed this ground of appeal.

                            Conclusion:

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C, and deleted the disallowance of UK lb 430 as expenses.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found