1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeals allowed, interest disallowance overturned for assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78. Loans justified by commercial considerations.</h1> The appeals were allowed, and the disallowance of interest payments for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78 was overturned. The Tribunal found that ... - Issues:Disallowance of interest payments for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78.Analysis:The appeals involved a common issue of disallowance of interest payments totaling Rs. 13,205 for 1976-77 and Rs. 11,367 for 1977-78. The assessee, engaged in trading, claimed interest payments but faced disallowance by the ITO due to interest-free loans given to directors and shareholders. The ITO charged interest at 18% based on the rates the company received from a related firm. The Commr. (Appeals) allowed interest for two directors but disputed loans to another individual, leading to a detailed analysis of various accounts and withdrawals. The ITO's disallowance was upheld for one individual, Chandarana, based on the net average debit balance in his accounts. The assessee argued the interest-free loans were justified due to commercial expediency, while the Deptl. Rep. contended it was unjustified. The Tribunal considered the role of Chandarana in the company, his lack of remuneration, and the commercial expediency of the interest-free loans. Ultimately, the Tribunal found the facility extended to Chandarana was justified by commercial considerations and deleted the additions sustained by the Commr. (Appeals).In conclusion, the appeals were allowed, and the disallowance of interest payments for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78 was overturned.