TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal orders fresh assessments implicating all legal heirs, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions</h1> <h3>Late Shri GS. Kamath Through Lr. Versus Income-Tax Officer.</h3> The Tribunal ordered fresh assessments for various years, directing the AO to implicate all legal heirs due to irregularities in not involving them ... Notice To Legal Heirs Issues:- Assessment and penalty orders not impleading all legal heirs- Application under section 154 for rectification rejected by AO- Appeal before CIT(A) challenging rejection of application- Disagreement on whether fresh assessment should be orderedAnalysis:Assessment and penalty orders not impleading all legal heirs:The case involved appeals by the assessee against assessment and penalty orders for various years, where all legal heirs were not impleaded. The AO argued that objections should have been raised earlier and notices were served on one legal heir. The CIT(A) found no illegality in the orders, citing certain notices issued to 'Ms. Gauri Kamath & Ors.' However, the representative of the assessee contended that each legal heir should be impleaded as per section 159, and penalties cannot be levied without affording an opportunity of being heard under section 274. Legal precedents were cited to support the need for implicating all legal heirs.Application under section 154 for rectification rejected by AO:One of the legal heirs made an application under section 154 for rectification, contending that all legal heirs should have been impleaded before assessments and penalties were finalized. The AO rejected the application, prompting an appeal before the CIT(A). The representative argued that the rejection was based on procedural grounds and did not consider the reply submitted. It was emphasized that penalties were also levied without impleading all legal heirs, which was against the law.Appeal before CIT(A) challenging rejection of application:The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the issue was not raised in the initial appeal and the matter was not free from doubt to be covered under section 154. The representative of the assessee reiterated the need to involve all legal heirs as per legal provisions and Supreme Court decisions. The Departmental Representative opposed sending the matter back for fresh assessment, arguing that no substantial injustice was caused and the CIT(A) had adequately addressed the issue.Disagreement on whether fresh assessment should be ordered:The Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both parties and analyzed relevant legal precedents. It was noted that while non-issuance of notice to all legal heirs would not render the assessment null and void, it constituted an irregularity that needed to be rectified. The Tribunal directed the AO to conduct fresh assessments for all years after implicating all legal heirs, setting aside the existing assessments and consequentially canceling the penalties. The decision was based on a comprehensive evaluation of the facts, legal provisions, and superior court rulings.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, arguments presented by both parties, legal precedents cited, and the ultimate decision of the Tribunal to order fresh assessments involving all legal heirs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
