Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1991 (4) TMI 169 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Denial of Deduction Claim for Small Scale Industrial Undertaking The tribunal upheld the decisions of the assessing officer and CIT (A) in denying the assessee's deduction claim as a small scale industrial undertaking ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Upholds Denial of Deduction Claim for Small Scale Industrial Undertaking

                          The tribunal upheld the decisions of the assessing officer and CIT (A) in denying the assessee's deduction claim as a small scale industrial undertaking under section 35B. It ruled that the exclusion of tools and moulds was not permissible in determining the aggregate value of plant and machinery. Additionally, vehicles were deemed part of 'plant,' and assets categorized as 'tools, jigs, dies, and moulds' were correctly classified as machinery. The tribunal rejected the appeal on the valuation date of plant and machinery and upheld the disallowance of festival-related expenses, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.




                          Issues:
                          1. Treatment of the assessee as a small scale industrial undertaking under section 35B of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. Inclusion of vehicles in the definition of 'plant' for the purposes of section 32A and section 35B.
                          3. Valuation of assets falling within the definition of 'tools, jigs, dies, and moulds' for section 32A(2).
                          4. Date of valuation of plant and machinery.
                          5. Disallowance of expenses related to Diwali, Dassera, and other festival occasions.

                          Analysis:

                          1. Treatment of the assessee as a small scale industrial undertaking:
                          The primary issue in this case revolved around the classification of the assessee as a small scale industrial undertaking under section 35B of the Income-tax Act. The assessee claimed a deduction under this provision, arguing that the aggregate value of its machinery and plant did not exceed Rs. 10,00,000. However, the assessing officer found that the value exceeded the limit, leading to the denial of the deduction. The CIT (A) upheld this decision, emphasizing that the value of tools and moulds should not be excluded when determining the aggregate value of plant and machinery. The tribunal concurred with the CIT (A) and dismissed the appeal, stating that the exclusion of tools and moulds was not warranted under the law.

                          2. Inclusion of vehicles in the definition of 'plant':
                          Another contention raised was whether vehicles could be considered as 'plant' for the purposes of section 32A and section 35B. The tribunal rejected the argument that vehicles should be excluded based on the term 'installed' in the statute. The tribunal cited the broad definition of 'install' and the operational use of vehicles by the assessee to justify their inclusion in the aggregate value of plant and machinery.

                          3. Valuation of assets categorized as 'tools, jigs, dies, and moulds':
                          The assessee disputed the treatment of certain assets as 'tools, jigs, dies, and moulds' instead of plant and machinery under section 32A(2). The tribunal analyzed the definitions of 'machine tools' and 'machinery' to determine that the items in question were correctly classified as machinery, not tools. The tribunal relied on the assessee's balance sheet, which separately listed moulds, patterns, and dies, supporting the inclusion of these assets in the value of plant and machinery.

                          4. Date of valuation of plant and machinery:
                          The tribunal considered the valuation date of plant and machinery as on 31-3-1979, aligning with the information provided by the assessee. The tribunal noted that there were no favorable circumstances for the assessee regarding the valuation date, leading to the rejection of this ground of appeal.

                          5. Disallowance of expenses related to festivals:
                          The final issue pertained to the disallowance of expenses related to Diwali, Dassera, and other festival occasions. The CIT (A) upheld the disallowance based on the judgment of the Bombay High Court, citing the case of Kolhapur Sugar Mills Ltd. The tribunal, in line with the High Court's decision, found no reason to interfere with the CIT (A)'s order, resulting in the dismissal of this ground of appeal.

                          In conclusion, the tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the assessing officer and the CIT (A) on various issues related to the classification of the assessee as a small scale industrial undertaking, inclusion of vehicles in the definition of 'plant,' valuation of assets, and disallowance of festival-related expenses.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found