Vocational receipts are taxable income when they have a proximate nexus with the work and are not casual gifts.

Receipts with a direct and intimate nexus to an assessee's vocational activity constitute income arising from that vocation. The amounts here were paid to support the assessee's preaching and propagation of religious views through a newspaper, and they continued while that activity continued; they were therefore not personal gifts divorced from the work. Once characterised as vocational income, the receipts could not qualify as casual and non-recurring receipts exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Supreme Court accordingly treated the amounts as taxable income arising from the assessee's vocation and denied the exemption.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amounts received by the assessee were income arising from the exercise of a vocation and, if so, whether they were exempt as casual and non-recurring receipts under section 4(3)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

Analysis: The receipts were found to have a direct and intimate connection with the assessee's activities of preaching and propagating religious views through the newspaper he published. The payments were made to support that activity and continued so long as the vocation continued. On those findings, the receipts were not mere personal gifts divorced from the assessee's work, but arose from the exercise of his vocation. Once the receipts were held to be income, they could not claim exemption under section 4(3)(vii), because they were not outside the scope of income arising from vocation.

Conclusion: The amounts were taxable income arising from the assessee's vocation and were not exempt under section 4(3)(vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

Ratio Decidendi: Receipts having a proximate nexus with the exercise of a vocation constitute taxable income, and such receipts cannot be treated as casual and non-recurring so as to fall within the exemption under section 4(3)(vii).

---