Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax Appeals Outcome: Customs fines as spare parts allowed, bonus deduction upheld, roads to be depreciated as buildings</h1> <h3>Income-Tax Officer. Versus National Organic Chemical Industries Limited.</h3> The appeals for the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74 were dismissed, while the appeal for the assessment year 1978-79 was partly allowed. The Tribunal ... Appellate Assistant Commissioner, High Court, Raw Material Issues Involved:1. Deduction of customs fines under the Sea Customs Act and Imports and Exports (Control) Act.2. Deduction of excess bonus under sections 36(1)(ii) and 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. Depreciation on roads within factory premises.4. Levy of interest under sections 215/217(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Deduction of Customs Fines:The primary issue in the appeals filed by the revenue concerns the allowance of deduction for customs fines amounting to Rs. 22,85,983, Rs. 1,84,225, and Rs. 7,000 made by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal had earlier directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to re-examine whether the goods imported by the assessee were spare parts or raw materials. After hearing expert evidence and detailed arguments, the Commissioner (Appeals) concluded that the goods were indeed spare parts necessary for the assessee's petrochemical manufacturing process. The Commissioner (Appeals) found no moral guilt or unlawful conduct on the part of the assessee, viewing the infraction as a mere technical breach. The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the goods were vital for the assessee's manufacturing process and that the penalties paid were necessary to redeem the goods, thus qualifying for deduction under the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT v. Pannalal Narottamdas & Co.2. Deduction of Excess Bonus:For the assessment year 1978-79, the Commissioner (Appeals) deleted an addition of Rs. 8,81,855 made by the ITO on account of excess bonus, which the ITO had restricted based on the Payment of Bonus Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the bonus payment was a contractual obligation and not challenged by the ITO. The Tribunal found that the assessee's obligation to pay 20% bonus was enforceable under a contractual agreement and that such payments were admissible under section 36(1)(ii) and section 37(1). The Tribunal also noted that under section 11 of the Payment of Bonus Act, the employer could pay up to 20% bonus if the allocable surplus exceeded the minimum required, thus supporting the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision.3. Depreciation on Roads:The issue of depreciation on roads within the factory premises was also contested. The Commissioner (Appeals) had allowed depreciation on roads at the rates applicable to plant and machinery, following the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's favor. However, the Tribunal noted the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT v. Sandvik Asia Ltd., which clarified that roads within factory premises should be treated as buildings and not as plant. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that the roads should be depreciated at rates applicable to buildings, thus siding with the revenue on this issue.4. Levy of Interest under Sections 215/217(1A):The final issue concerned the levy of interest under sections 215/217(1A). The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the ITO's order on this point, directing a re-examination of the assessee's liability, as the ITO's order lacked clarity. The revenue argued that the Commissioner (Appeals) had no power to set aside an assessment on a particular point and that no appeal was provided against such a levy. The Tribunal, referencing the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT v. Daimler Benz A.G., upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision, noting that the assessee had challenged the very jurisdiction of the ITO to levy interest. The Tribunal found no substance in the revenue's appeal on this issue, thus rejecting it.Conclusion:The appeals for the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74 were dismissed, while the appeal for the assessment year 1978-79 was partly allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found