1983 (12) TMI 90 - AT - Income Tax

Trust entitled to section 80L deduction as individual, not AOP. Clarifies eligibility for deduction under Income-tax Act.

The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, affirming that the assessee-trust is entitled to deduction under section 80L of the Income-tax Act, 1961. ... Deductions, Interest On Securities, Dividends, Etc. Issues:1. Whether the assessee-trust is eligible for relief under section 80L of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Whether the status of the assessee should be considered as an individual, an Association of Persons (AOP), or a Body of Individuals (BOI).3. Whether a trust with multiple beneficiaries or trustees can be classified as an 'association of persons.'Analysis:1. The judgment revolves around the eligibility of the assessee-trust for relief under section 80L of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed the claim for relief under section 80L on the basis that it is only available to 'individuals' and 'HUFs', with exceptions for husband and wife from former Portuguese territories. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) allowed the claim, considering the assessee as an individual, leading to an appeal by the department against this decision.2. The department argued that the status of the assessee as an AOP was correct, as per the provisions of section 80L and section 164 of the Act. They contended that the AAC erred in altering the status to an individual and granting relief under section 80L. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions and held that the relief under section 80L is available to individuals, HUFs, AOPs, and BOIs representing husband and wife under Portuguese law. The Tribunal found the department's argument of excluding AOPs from the provision untenable, especially in the context of a husband and wife scenario.3. The Tribunal further discussed the classification of trusts with multiple beneficiaries or trustees as an 'association of persons.' The department argued that section 164 would classify such trusts as AOPs, citing precedents and legal provisions. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the trust's status should be considered as that of an individual, not an AOP. The Tribunal highlighted that the general law relating to trusts and the Supreme Court's decisions did not support classifying such trusts as AOPs.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, affirming that the assessee-trust is entitled to deduction under section 80L, emphasizing the eligibility of individuals, HUFs, AOPs, and BOIs for the relief. The judgment clarified the status of the assessee as an individual eligible for the deduction, rejecting the department's arguments regarding the classification of trusts as AOPs based on the number of beneficiaries or trustees.