Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment initiated under section 34(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 was barred by time and, if so, whether it was saved by the second proviso to section 34(3) of that Act.
Analysis: The finding recorded in the earlier reference that the income belonged to the trust and not to the individual assessee was a finding necessary for disposing of that reference, and therefore fell within the scope of the second proviso to section 34(3). However, the saving provision applies only where reassessment is sought against the assessee or any person intimately connected with the assessment in which the finding was given. The trust was a separate entity and a stranger to the assessment proceedings of the individual assessee, so it could not be treated as "any person" for the purpose of the proviso.
Conclusion: The reassessment was time barred and was not saved by the second proviso to section 34(3); the appeal failed.