Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Supreme Court affirms time-barred reassessment against assessee-trust due to lack of connection.</h1> <h3>CIT, Punjab, Jammu And Kashmir And Himachal Pradesh Versus S. Raghubir Singh Trust (Through-I Chairman Major Harjender Singh)</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision that reassessment proceedings against the assessee-trust were time-barred as ... Whether the reassessment sought to be made by the ITO on the assessee-trust under s. 34(1)(b), was time barred - assessee-trust was clearly a stranger to the assessment proceedings of S. Raghubir Singh and it was not ' any person ' within the meaning of the second proviso to s. 34(3). The High Court was, therefore, right in taking the view that the second proviso to s. 34(3) was not attracted and the reassessment proceedings against the assessee-trust were barred by time. Issues:1. Determination of the time-barred reassessment under section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 for an assessee-trust.Analysis:The judgment involved an appeal regarding the time limitation for a reassessment by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) on an assessee-trust under section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922. The case originated from the creation of the assessee-trust by Shri S. Raghubir Singh, with the relevant assessment year being 1954-55. Initially, the ITO considered the trust as sham and included its income in the individual assessment of S. Raghubir Singh. However, upon appeal, the Punjab High Court ruled that the trust was valid, leading the ITO to issue a notice seeking to reopen the assessment of the trust under section 34(1)(b) on 19th September 1961. The assessee-trust contended that the reassessment was time-barred, but the ITO proceeded with the reassessment, resulting in an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) and then to the Tribunal.The Tribunal, after obtaining a remand report, concluded that the assessee-trust was not intimately connected with the assessment of S. Raghubir Singh, and the second proviso to section 34(3) did not save the reassessment from the limitation period. Subsequently, the matter was referred to the High Court, which upheld the Tribunal's decision, stating that the assessee-trust and S. Raghubir Singh were distinct entities, and the second proviso to section 34(3) did not apply. The revenue then appealed to the Supreme Court after obtaining a certificate of fitness from the High Court.The Supreme Court referred to the conditions for the applicability of the second proviso to section 34(3 as established in previous judgments. It highlighted that for the second proviso to apply, the reassessment must be a consequence of a finding in an earlier order and must be sought on the assessee or any person intimately connected with the assessment. The Court noted that the finding by the Punjab High Court that the income belonged to the assessee-trust was necessary for disposing of the reference in favor of S. Raghubir Singh. However, it emphasized that the assessee-trust was a stranger to the assessment proceedings of S. Raghubir Singh and not intimately connected, thus not falling under the definition of 'any person' within the second proviso to section 34(3).Ultimately, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision that the reassessment proceedings against the assessee-trust were time-barred as the second proviso to section 34(3) did not apply due to the lack of intimate connection between the trust and the assessment of S. Raghubir Singh.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found