1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Firm liable for interest on tax deduction failure; Tribunal rejects individual partner responsibility argument.</h1> The ITAT Bangalore upheld the Assessing Officer's decision to charge interest under section 201(1A) on a firm for not deducting tax at source on interest ... Deduction Of Tax At Source, Interest Other Than Interest On Securities The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore upheld the decision of the Assessing Officer to charge interest under section 201(1A) on a firm for not deducting tax at source on interest payment, rejecting the firm's argument that partners, as individuals, were responsible for the payment. The Tribunal ruled that the firm, as a separate entity, was obligated to deduct tax at source, and dismissed the appeal. (Case citation: 2001 (2) TMI 263 - ITAT BANGALORE)