Tribunal Delivers Mixed Rulings on Tax Deductions, Remands on Third-Party Manufacturing, Adjusts Depreciation Rules.

Aarti Industries Limited. Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax.

Aarti Industries Limited. Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax. - TTJ 095, 014, Issues Involved:
1. Exclusion of 90% excise duty refund from profit of business for deduction u/s 80HHC.
2. Exclusion of sale of scrap, sundry balance written back, and octroi refund for deduction u/s 80-I.
3. Computation of deduction u/s 80HH and 80-I for Sarigam unit.
4. Deduction of public issue expenditures.
5. Deduction of advertising expenses and press announcement expenditure u/s 37(3).
6. Deduction u/s 80HHC without tax auditors' report.
7. Exclusion of excise duty from turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC.
8. Exclusion of 90% processing charges from profit of business for deduction u/s 80HHC.
9. Depreciation on energy saving devices and related structures.
10. Treatment of interest income from temporary investment of share application money.
11. Deduction u/s 80-I/IA on rental income.
12. Deduction u/s 80HHA and 80-I for manufacturing activity at third party premises.
13. Exclusion of excise duty and sales tax from total turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC.
14. Deduction of interest paid to GIDC u/s 36(1)(iii).

Summary:

1. Exclusion of 90% excise duty refund from profit of business for deduction u/s 80HHC:
The CIT(A) directed the AO not to exclude 90% of the excise duty refund from the profit of the business, as it did not represent a receipt similar to brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or charges as mentioned in Explanation (baa) to s. 80HHC(4B). The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that the excise duty refund did not affect the business profits of the assessee.

2. Exclusion of sale of scrap, sundry balance written back, and octroi refund for deduction u/s 80-I:
The CIT(A) included the sale of scrap, sundry debtors written back, and octroi refund in the business income for deduction u/s 80-I, except for rent. The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of scrap sales but reversed the inclusion of sundry debtors written back and octroi refund, following the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in Harjivandas Juthabhai.

3. Computation of deduction u/s 80HH and 80-I for Sarigam unit:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow separate deductions under ss. 80HH and 80-I independently, following the judgment of various High Courts.

4. Deduction of public issue expenditures:
The CIT(A) directed the AO to exclude Rs. 24,05,135 from the assessed income as these expenditures were capitalized and not charged to the P&L account. The Tribunal upheld this decision.

5. Deduction of advertising expenses and press announcement expenditure u/s 37(3):
The CIT(A) allowed the deduction of advertising expenses and press announcements u/s 37(3), stating that these expenses were not covered under s. 35D(2)(c)(iv). The Tribunal upheld this decision.

6. Deduction u/s 80HHC without tax auditors' report:
The CIT(A) allowed the deduction u/s 80HHC despite the initial non-filing of the tax auditors' report, as it was filed during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal upheld this decision, following the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries.

7. Exclusion of excise duty from turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that excise duty refund should not be included in the total turnover for computing deduction u/s 80HHC, following its earlier decision in the assessee's own case for the asst. yr. 1992-93.

8. Exclusion of 90% processing charges from profit of business for deduction u/s 80HHC:
The CIT(A) held that processing charges were related to the main manufacturing activity and should not be excluded from business profits. The Tribunal upheld this decision, applying the rule of ejusdem generis.

9. Depreciation on energy saving devices and related structures:
The Tribunal directed the AO to allow 100% depreciation on energy saving devices but restrict depreciation on the related building/structure to 25%, treating it as plant.

10. Treatment of interest income from temporary investment of share application money:
The Tribunal allowed the set-off of interest income earned on share application money against public issue expenses, distinguishing it from the Supreme Court's ruling in Tuticorin Alkalies and following the decisions in Bokaro Steel Ltd. and Karnal Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd.

11. Deduction u/s 80-I/IA on rental income:
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80-I/IA on rental income, following the Supreme Court's decision in Pandian Chemicals Ltd.

12. Deduction u/s 80HHA and 80-I for manufacturing activity at third party premises:
The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for fresh consideration, following its earlier decision in the assessee's own case for the asst. yr. 1992-93.

13. Exclusion of excise duty and sales tax from total turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC:
The Tribunal allowed the exclusion of excise duty and sales tax from total turnover for computing deduction u/s 80HHC, following the Special Bench decision in IFB Agro Industries and the Calcutta High Court's decision in Chloride India Ltd.

14. Deduction of interest paid to GIDC u/s 36(1)(iii):
The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the deduction of interest paid to GIDC u/s 36(1)(iii), following the jurisdictional High Court's decision in Core Healthcare Ltd.

In conclusion, the appeals were partly allowed, and partly dismissed, with several issues being restored to the AO for fresh consideration.