Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appeal allowed by ITAT, penalty unjustified under section 271(1)(a). Fresh order directed, ITO's affidavit crucial.</h1> The ITAT Ahmedabad-C allowed the appeal, finding the penalty under s. 271(1)(a) unjustified. The AAC directed a fresh order, stressing the importance of ... ITAT AHMEDABAD-C The ITAT Ahmedabad-C considered a penalty levied under s. 271(1)(a) against the assessee. The AAC found the penalty unjustified and directed a fresh order, emphasizing the need for the ITO to be heard regarding the affidavit. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.