Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Revenue appeals dismissed for assessment years 1971-72 to 1976-77. Appellate decisions upheld on income additions.</h1> The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment years 1971-72 to 1976-77. The decisions of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner ... - Issues Involved:1. Reduction of addition on account of suppressed professional receipts for the assessment years 1971-72 to 1976-77.2. Deletion of addition on account of unexplained investment in fixed deposit in the name of the father of the assessee.3. Deletion of addition on account of unexplained investment in gold ornaments and jewellery for the assessment year 1976-77.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Reduction of Addition on Account of Suppressed Professional Receipts:For the assessment year 1971-72, the Income Tax Officer (ITO) initially added Rs. 6,524 to the assessee's income for suppressed professional receipts linked with low withdrawals for household expenses. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) reduced this addition to Rs. 1,000. The ITO had rejected the book results maintained by the assessee, a surgeon, due to discrepancies in the records of outdoor patients and the absence of proper billing and receipt books. The ITO estimated 10% of the gross receipts as suppressed income, but the AAC found that the receipts from outdoor patients would only amount to 1-2% of the total receipts and that the assessee had adequately proved that certain patients were not charged. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, stating that no basis existed for the addition of Rs. 6,524 and that the ITO's rejection of the book results was justified. The appeal for the assessment year 1971-72 was dismissed.For the assessment year 1972-73, the ITO determined the suppressed professional income at Rs. 12,000. The AAC reduced this to Rs. 1,000, and the Tribunal agreed, noting that irregularities found in the previous year could not justify assuming suppressed income for subsequent years. The appeal for 1972-73 was dismissed.For the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75, and 1975-76, similar grounds were raised regarding suppressed professional receipts and low withdrawals for household expenses. The AAC reduced the additions to Rs. 1,000 for each year, and the Tribunal confirmed these reductions, dismissing the appeals for these years.2. Deletion of Addition on Account of Unexplained Investment in Fixed Deposit:For the assessment year 1972-73, the ITO added Rs. 20,000 as unexplained investment in a fixed deposit in the name of the father of the assessee. The AAC deleted this addition, accepting the assessee's claim that the deposit was made by his father, who had substantial means and managed his family affairs well. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, finding no reason to disbelieve the affidavits and statements supporting the assessee's claim. The appeal for this issue was dismissed.For the assessment years 1973-74 and 1976-77, similar issues were raised regarding interest on the fixed deposit. The Tribunal confirmed the AAC's deletion of these additions, dismissing the appeals for these years.3. Deletion of Addition on Account of Unexplained Investment in Gold Ornaments and Jewellery:For the assessment year 1976-77, the ITO added Rs. 46,300 as unexplained investment in gold ornaments and jewellery found during a search. The AAC deleted this addition, accepting the assessee's explanation that the gold was received as 'Streedhan' at the time of his wife's marriage, supported by affidavits from family members and the custom of the community. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, finding no reason to disbelieve the affidavits and statements. The appeal for this issue was dismissed.Conclusion:The Tribunal, after considering the evidence and arguments, dismissed all the appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment years 1971-72 to 1976-77. The decisions of the AAC to reduce or delete the additions made by the ITO on account of suppressed professional receipts, unexplained investment in fixed deposits, and unexplained investment in gold ornaments and jewellery were upheld.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found