1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Assessee's Penalty Overturned for Loss Assessment Year 1985-86</h1> The Tribunal held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as the assessment resulted in a loss, overturning the penalty of Rs. 1 lakh ... Computation Of Capital, Mistake Apparent From Record Issues Involved: The judgment involves the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in a sum of Rs. 1 lakh on the assessee for the assessment year 1985-86.Details of the Judgment:1. Issue 1 - Concealment Penalty in Case of Loss Assessment: - The assessee contended that penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as the assessment resulted in a substantial loss of Rs. 9,80,397. - Cited High Court decisions and Tribunal rulings supporting the stance that penalty is not leviable when assessment shows a loss. - Highlighted that the penalty order was based on an item described as 'lease expenses' which was actually a provision for customer claims, approved by the Institute of Chartered Accountants. - Departmental Representative argued that the change in the accounting system by the assessee was not properly disclosed, justifying the penalty. - The Tribunal noted various legal precedents and concluded that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied when the assessment results in a loss, based on a strict interpretation of the statutory provisions.2. Conclusion: - The Tribunal found that the penalty order could not be sustained as the assessment had resulted in a loss, making the penalty under section 271(1)(c) inapplicable. - Consequently, the penalty was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.