Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, engaged in removal of overburden and excavation for exposing lignite in a mine, was engaged in mining so as to qualify as an industrial company under section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1982.
Analysis: The definition of industrial company covered a company mainly engaged, inter alia, in mining. The work undertaken consisted of removing the earth layer above lignite to reach the mineral for further mining. Such removal was treated as an integral part of mining activity, and it was not necessary that the assessee should also be engaged in processing of goods.
Conclusion: The assessee was engaged in mining and was therefore an industrial company within section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1982. The claim for tax benefit was allowed and the matter was remitted for recomputation accordingly.