TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Modvat Credit Allowed for Tool Kits & Jack Handle</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE Versus BAJAJ TEMPO LTD.</h3> The appeal was dismissed, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) allowing Modvat credit on tool kits and Jack handle based on precedent and ... Cenvat/Modvat Issues involved: Appeal against Order-in-Appeal allowing Modvat credit on tool kits and Jack handle.Summary:The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Appeal allowing Modvat credit on tool kits and Jack handle. The appellate authority relied on a previous Tribunal decision in the case of Bajaj Auto Ltd. However, in a different case involving Daewoo Motors India Ltd., this Tribunal disagreed with the decision in Bajaj Auto Ltd. The Tribunal in the Daewoo Motors case concluded that the decision of the Larger Bench in Bajaj Auto cannot be considered good law based on a Supreme Court decision in the case of Telco. Despite this, the Tribunal noted that the decision of the Larger Bench in Bajaj Auto Ltd. regarding tool kits as inputs and credit availability could not be ignored, especially since it was in the same industry and concerning the same item. Therefore, the appeal of the department was dismissed, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).This judgment highlights the importance of precedent and the application of legal principles in determining Modvat credit eligibility for specific items, emphasizing the significance of industry-specific decisions and the relevance of Supreme Court rulings in interpreting Tribunal decisions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
