Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was leviable on customs duty in respect of warehoused capital goods, spares and raw materials imported under the exemption notification, and whether delay in de-bonding the unit from the EOU scheme affected the liability to pay interest.
Analysis: The exemption notification applicable to warehoused goods under Chapter IX of the Customs Act was held to cover interest accrued on the customs duty payable. Since the authorities overlooked this statutory exemption, confirmation of interest was not justified. The delay in granting permission to withdraw from the EOU scheme was also taken into account, and in the circumstances of the case the demand for interest was found unsustainable.
Conclusion: Interest was held not leviable, and the demand confirmed in the impugned order was set aside, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee obtained relief against the interest demand on the imported warehoused goods.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing exemption notification excludes interest on duty payable for warehoused goods, interest cannot be confirmed merely because customs duty becomes payable, particularly when departmental delay in de-bonding also contributes to the dispute.