Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Overturns License Suspension Due to Lack of Evidence, Emphasizes Fairness in Enforcement Actions.</h1> The Tribunal set aside the suspension of the Custom House Clearing Agent's license, ruling it unjustified and a violation of natural justice. The ... Customs House Agent's Licence - Suspension of and stoppage of the CHA - Violation of the principles of Natural justice - HELD THAT:- The power of suspension envisages an immediate nexus, in time, with the event. The suspension and stoppage of the CHA to conduct its business and entry in the Custom House of Mumbai or other places could be called for, only if a finding is arrived at that the presence of such persons in the Custom House and the continuation of the licence would result in tampering with evidence. The matter in this case is being investigated by the CBI, there is no finding on record or an allegation that there is an attempt to tamper with evidence which should call for immediate exercise of the powers to suspend the CHA licence & entry of all other employees, resulting on a total stoppage of the work & livelihood of 10 other employees of this Private Limited Company. We find, there was no reason to call for or uphold for suspension in March 2005 for an alleged act of a kind mentioned to have been committed in July 2004. The order passed cannot be upheld. We find no reasons to uphold the order of suspension in the facts of this case as far as this CHA firm is concerned and to call for suspension of all employee. If at all it should be upheld, it would be only as regards the identity card and licence of the clerk Shri Darshan Lal More. Therefore, the order of suspension as regards the CHA firm & other employees and change in Surety is set aside. Since the order is found to be in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and travels beyond a suspension envisaged under regulations. We find that no purpose will be served by passing an interim order of stay. We would allow the appeal itself at this stage after setting aside the order. We make it clear that setting aside this suspension order will not call for interference with the enquiries ordered under Regulation 22 of CHALR 2004. This appeal is therefore allowed in above terms. Issues:Suspension of Custom House Clearing Agent Licence based on alleged misconduct.Analysis:1. Suspension Order Validity:- The suspension order was issued based on a report recommending blacklisting of the Clearing Agent.- The order was found to be in denial of natural justice and resulted in significant damage to the agent's reputation.- The Commissioner's conclusion regarding the employee's involvement in bribery lacked substantial evidence and violated principles of natural justice.2. Vicarious Liability:- The acceptance of bribe money by an employee cannot automatically lead to the suspension of the company's license.- The firm cannot be penalized for the alleged criminal act of an individual employee without conclusive evidence.- The firm had been conducting business without any issues post the alleged incident, indicating no immediate threat to evidence tampering.3. Immediate Nexus for Suspension:- The power of suspension requires a direct link to the event, which was not established in this case.- There was no evidence or allegation of tampering with evidence to justify the immediate suspension of the license and business operations.- The order to suspend the license and stop business activities was deemed unjustified and in violation of established legal principles.4. Legal Precedents and Tribunal Decisions:- The Tribunal's previous decisions emphasized that suspension should only be imposed to safeguard the interests of the Custom House.- The order's language and implications suggested a termination of the license rather than a temporary suspension, which was considered excessive and unwarranted.- Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that the suspension order, as applied to the firm and its employees, was not justified and should be set aside.5. Natural Justice and Appeal Outcome:- The suspension order was deemed to be a gross violation of natural justice principles and regulatory limits.- The appeal was allowed, setting aside the suspension order while clarifying that the ongoing enquiries under Regulation 22 would continue unaffected.- No interim stay order was deemed necessary, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellant, highlighting the lack of justification for the suspension based on the available evidence.This detailed analysis highlights the key legal aspects and findings of the judgment, focusing on the suspension of the Custom House Clearing Agent License and the associated legal implications and violations.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found