Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty could be demanded on inputs lying in stock when the unutilised MODVAT credit had lapsed on withdrawal of the facility and the manufacturer had shifted to the compounded levy scheme.
Analysis: The MODVAT facility stood withdrawn for the notified goods with effect from 1-8-1997. The balance credit relating to inputs on the notified date remained unutilised and, under the applicable rule, stood lapsed. Once the credit had lapsed, no further duty demand could be made in respect of the inputs lying in stock. The matter was treated as covered by the earlier view applying the same principle in similar circumstances.
Conclusion: The duty demand was unsustainable and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.