Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty and interest could be set aside merely because the duty was paid before issuance of the show cause notice, notwithstanding non-compliance with the exemption notification condition and the subsequent demand.
Analysis: The respondents cleared the goods without payment of duty while availing exemption under Notification No. 5/98 and without obtaining the certificate required by the mandatory condition of the notification. The duty was not paid voluntarily in the sense recognised by the earlier decisions relied upon, but was deposited after the departmental scrutiny revealed wrongful availing of the exemption. In such circumstances, the rationale that pre-show cause notice payment bars penalty under Section 11AC was held inapplicable. The deliberate breach of the notification condition and the intent to derive wrongful gain justified restoration of the adjudicating authority's order. However, the penalty was moderated having regard to the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The setting aside of penalty and interest by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unsustainable. Penalty and interest were restored, with the penalty reduced to Rs. 10,000/-.
Ratio Decidendi: Pre-show cause notice payment does not by itself preclude penalty and interest where duty was not paid voluntarily and the assessee deliberately violated a mandatory exemption condition.