TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether finished goods found in excess of the recorded stock were liable to confiscation and, if so, whether the redemption fine required reduction; (ii) Whether Modvat credit was admissible on inputs found short in stock but not shown to have been used in or in relation to manufacture.
Issue (i): Whether finished goods found in excess of the recorded stock were liable to confiscation and, if so, whether the redemption fine required reduction.
Analysis: Under the Central Excise Rules, 2002, an assessee must maintain proper daily production records, and goods manufactured but not accounted for in such records are liable to confiscation. The fact that there was no allegation of intended clandestine removal did not negate confiscability, because liability under the relevant rule does not depend on proof of mens rea in the same manner as provisions requiring intent to evade duty. However, the quantum of redemption fine must be proportionate to the circumstances.
Conclusion: The excess finished goods were liable to confiscation, but the redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 80,000 in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit was admissible on inputs found short in stock but not shown to have been used in or in relation to manufacture.
Analysis: Modvat credit is available only where the inputs are used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products cleared on payment of duty. On the admitted facts, the inputs found short were not established to have been so used, and the explanation of loss in sweeping or storage was not sufficient to displace that position on the record.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the inputs found short was not admissible, and the disallowance was upheld against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of reduction of redemption fine, while the confiscation of excess finished goods and the denial of Modvat credit on short inputs were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods manufactured but not accounted for in the prescribed daily stock records are liable to confiscation under the excise penalty provisions, and Modvat credit is admissible only for inputs actually used in or in relation to manufacture.
TaxTMI 
