Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to carry forward to subsequent years not only his share of loss but also the share of loss of his wife from the firm.
Analysis: Section 64(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is analogous to section 16(3)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The provision creates an artificial liability and the expression "income" in that setting was considered in the earlier binding decision to include loss as well as profit for the purpose of set-off and carry forward. The later statutory Explanation added in 1979 was treated as a legislative exposition of the same meaning. The Court followed the settled construction that the spouse's share of loss from a firm, when clubbed under section 64(1)(i), is to be treated as part of the assessee's own business result for the purpose of set-off and carry forward.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue; the assessee was entitled to carry forward the wife's share of loss along with his own share of loss.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of section 64(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the word "income" includes loss, and the spouse's share of loss from a firm included under that provision is to be treated as the assessee's own loss for set-off and carry forward.